🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.