🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since that time, focusing less on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is observed is a manifestation of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the records is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.